There are currently 21 states that have implemented Religious Freedom Restoration Acts.
With state legislatures entering the busiest time of their legislative calendar, a number of states are considering Religious Freedom Restoration Acts (RFRA) that would protect citizens’ fundamental rights from unreasonable and unnecessary government coercion.
West Virginia and Georgia are among the states that have introduced state-level versions of the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, which prohibit substantial government burdens on religious exercise unless the government can show a compelling interest in burdening religious liberty and does so through the least restrictive means.
Despite the mischaracterizations of Religious Freedom Restoration Acts by liberals, media outlets, and big business, these laws would prevent government discrimination against religious free exercise and simply provide a way to balance religious liberty with compelling government interests. Religious liberty shouldn’t always trump, which is why Religious Freedom Restoration Acts strike the right balance.
The First Amendment Partnership, an organization whose mission is “to promote and protect religious freedom for people of all faiths,” created the below infographic separating myth from fact on Religious Freedom Restoration Acts:
Despite strong deference to religious freedom, the laws don’t allow individuals to do whatever they wish in the name of religion. The laws are simply a commonsense way of balancing government interests with the fundamental freedom of individuals to live out their faith.
Religious Freedom Restoration Acts rightly set a high bar for the government to meet in order to restrict religious freedom. But there will be times when the government can show it has a compelling reason for burdening religious expression—to ensure public safety, for instance.
Continue reading below…