Senate president Thomas Philipp said: ‘Four years are appropriate here.’”
Why? Does Austria need more Muslim migrant rapists on the streets? If he were a native Austrian, would his sentence have been cut? Or would keeping him too long in prison be “Islamophobic”?
He might not have known that the boy was saying no, you see. As if raping a ten-year-old boy is just fine if the boy is saying yes.
This kind of legalistic twaddle — always in favor of Muslim migrants, never at their expense — heralds the demise of Europe and the West.
As for the act itself, in Afghanistan and elsewhere in the Islamic world, it is broadly tolerated. Women are so devalued, men look to other men and boys for sexual pleasure. Also, the Qur’an promises not just virgins to the blessed, but boys like “scattered pearls”:
“Those are the ones brought near in the Gardens of Pleasure, a company of the former peoples and a few of the later peoples, on thrones woven, reclining on them, facing each other. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal with vessels, pitchers and a cup from a flowing spring.” — Qur’an 56:11-18
“And they will be given to drink a cup whose mixture is of ginger, a fountain within Paradise named Salsabeel. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them scattered pearls. And when you look there, you will see pleasure and great dominion.” — Qur’an 76:17-20
Combine all that with the idea that non-Muslims exist for the pleasure of Muslims, and you get this: a telling incident from the wonderful new multicultural Europe.
“Migrant who admitted raping a 10-year-old boy at an Austrian swimming pool because of a ‘sexual emergency’ has his sentence cut and will soon be free,” by Jay Akbar, Mailonline, May 24, 2017:
The migrant who raped a young boy in a swimming pool because he ‘had not had sex for four months’ has had his sentence reduced and will soon be free.
The Senate of the Supreme Court of Austria has ruled that the sentence of 20-year-old Iraqi asylum seeker, known only as Amir A, will be reduced from seven to four years after he raped a ten-year-old boy who suffered horrific injuries as a result.
The perpetrator has already served a significant part of his sentence.
Senate president Thomas Philipp said: ‘Four years are appropriate here.’
Amir A’s lawyers had sought a retrial after successfully arguing that the original trial had not done enough to discover if he knew for certain that his victim was saying no.
The appeal had shocked legal experts because as a 10-year-old minor, the victim could never have given his consent to sex.
Now judges at Austria’s Supreme Court have found the asylum seeker guilty for a second time – and jailed him for seven years.
The rapist had been taken to the Austrian capital’s Theresienbad pool in December last year as part of his integration programme.
But he dragged his victim into a changing room where he locked the door and subjected him to a sickening sexual assault.
The court heard that the schoolboy needed urgent medical treatment for agonising injuries sustained in the attack….
After the rape, the accused calmly returned to the pool and was using the diving board when officers arrived to arrest him.
He first confessed to the rape, saying he knew it was wrong but did it anyway because it was a ‘sexual emergency’ because he had not had sex for four months.
His lawyers later changed his story claiming there were doubts over whether he knew the victim had denied consent.
He was found guilty of serious sexual assault and rape of a minor….