This link leads to an interesting discussion by Tony Warren about the year of Christ’s birth. Many people believe Jesus was 33 years old at His crucifixion because His death was recorded as 33 A.D. But there are compelling scriptural arguments that Christ was in fact NOT born at year 0 but rather at 7 B.C. This would make Him 40 at his crucifixion rather than 33. This would make strong Biblical sense since we see 40 years used as symbolic of a Biblical generation. One of the many symbols surrounding Christ would be that he represents “perfect” obedience to the law for a generation, fulfilling symbolically successful adherence to the laws of God. His perfection then being representative for you and me, because we are totally incapable of perfect obedience to God. I, for one, am thankful for his sacrificial life. Click link below to see why 7 B.C. seems more probable as the year of Christs birth.
It is our sacred responsibility to examine every doctrine to determine if it is true or false. But how can we distinguish sound doctrine from false? How can we distinguish […]
If you’ve ever wondered about the connection between feminism and LGBT identities, a recent article by Marcie Bianco at NBC News clears things up. Among other things, Bianco says this: […]
Editor: Michael Horton is a solid teacher of the Bible. I wholeheartedly endorse him as a reliable resource in your studies. Michael Horton (@MichaelHorton_) is the Professor of Systematic Theology and Apologetics […]
Erick Erickson – The Resurgent If you want a sense of where the left is headed nationally, look at what progressive legislators in Texas are trying to do. They want […]